All posts

One of the best people I’ve ever hired left.

I don’t want to turn that into a comfortable story about someone finding another opportunity. I want to ask what made staying less attractive than leaving.

I believe the leadership environment contributed to losing someone I valued enormously. That is my assessment. Her reasons are hers to describe, and I don’t want to put words in her mouth.

But I can talk about the questions her departure leaves me asking.

Could people raise concerns without having the conversation become a judgment about their attitude? When someone needed help, did we provide it? Were we willing to examine a decision that was making their work harder, or did we expect them to keep absorbing the consequences?

Those questions deserve answers before we congratulate ourselves on managing the transition.

It is tempting to measure a departure by the vacancy. Update the job description, redistribute the tasks, find a replacement. There is work to do, and someone needs to do it.

But that response can leave the working conditions untouched. We can hire another capable person into the same problems and call the position filled.

I want us to look at what the person was carrying as well as what they were producing: the extra coordination, the workarounds, the repeated explanations, the effort it took to get a concern heard. Those are things to investigate, not assumptions I can make about someone else’s experience.

And we shouldn’t wait for a resignation to ask about them.

When someone reliably gets through difficult work, it can be easy to mistake the result for evidence that the process is fine. They managed it last time. They’ll manage it again.

I don’t want that to become our definition of a good employee: someone who can tolerate an environment we should be improving.

There is a responsibility here for me too. Hiring someone I believe in doesn’t finish my part of the job. Did I help them get the support they needed? Did I make room for their concerns? Did I speak up where it could affect a decision, or only offer sympathy afterward?

Being frustrated with leadership doesn’t exempt me from those questions.

I also know that someone leaving doesn’t, by itself, prove every criticism of a company. People have lives, ambitions, and reasons that don’t belong in a public post. A departure calls for curiosity and honest examination, not a story we can use to declare ourselves right.

That examination needs to include leadership’s own behavior. If we only ask whether the departing employee was a good fit, we have left ourselves out of the inquiry.

I’m sorry to lose someone I regard so highly. I’m angry that I believe we could have done better.

I would like that anger to result in something more useful than a private conversation after the fact.

Ask people what is making their work unnecessarily difficult. Listen when the answer is uncomfortable. Change what you reasonably can, and explain what you can’t.

And when a good person decides to leave, don’t let filling the vacancy stand in for understanding the loss.