All posts

It’s easy to say you welcome feedback.

The test comes when someone disagrees with a decision you have already made, in front of other people, and their objection makes the conversation uncomfortable.

What happens next?

Do you answer the concern? Ask questions? Explain the tradeoff?

Or does the discussion drift into what you personally prefer, why another job requires something different, or how everyone should be flexible? By then the original concern disappears without an answer...

You can end a conversation politely and still leave someone feeling unheard.

I recently thanked someone for raising an uncomfortable concern publicly. I appreciated the substance of what they said, but I also appreciated that they were willing to say it where others could hear it.

That matters. When an objection stays private, everyone else may assume they are the only person who has it.

Workplace policies are a good example. People have different responsibilities, working conditions, and needs. My preference as a developer is to have substantial uninterrupted time for focused work, with collaboration planned deliberately. Someone else may work differently.

We should be able to discuss those differences without treating a question about the policy as a question about someone’s commitment to the team.

And answering an objection requires engaging with the objection itself. Explaining why an unrelated role needs to be physically present doesn’t settle whether the same requirement makes sense for a developer.

Management still has to make decisions. Listening doesn’t require agreement, and an open discussion doesn’t give every participant a veto.

But there should be an explanation people can examine: here is the constraint, here is the evidence, here are the alternatives we considered, and here is why we chose this approach.

“I heard you” means more when you can explain what you heard.

There is also a responsibility for the rest of us. If someone raises a concern we share, we can say so. Privately thanking them afterward is kind, but it leaves them carrying the disagreement alone in the room where the decision happens.

Public support can be simple:

“That concerns me too.”

“I don’t think we’ve answered that question yet.”

“Can we come back to the point they raised?”

You don’t have to turn every meeting into an argument. You can help keep a reasonable question from being smoothed out of the conversation.

If we invite people to speak honestly, we need to leave room for an answer we didn’t want to hear.